Canadian
Research
Alberta
British
Columbia
Manitoba
New Brunswick
Newfoundland
Northern
Territories
Nova Scotia
Nunavut
Ontario
Prince Edward
Island
Quebec
Saskatchewan
Yukon
Canadian Indian
Tribes
Chronicles of
Canada
Free Genealogy Forms
Family Tree
Chart
Research
Calendar
Research Extract
Free Census
Forms
Correspondence Record
Family Group Chart
Source
Summary New Genealogy Data
Family Tree Search
Biographies
Genealogy Books For Sale
Indian Mythology
US Genealogy
Other Websites
British Isles Genealogy
Australian Genealogy
FREE Web Site Hosting at
Canadian Genealogy
|
The Loyalist in his New Home
The social history of the United Empire Loyalists
was not greatly different from that of other pioneer settlers in the
Canadian forest. Their homes were such as could have been seen until
recently in many of the outlying parts of the country. In Nova
Scotia and New Brunswick some of the better class of settlers were
able to put up large and comfortable wooden houses, some of which
are still standing. But even there most of them had to be content
with primitive quarters. Edward Winslow was not a poor man, as
poverty was reckoned in those days. Yet he lived in rather meager
style. He described his house at Granville, opposite Annapolis, as
being 'almost as large as my log house, divided into two rooms,
where we are snug as pokers.' Two years later, after he had made
additions to it, he proposed advertising it for sale in the
following terms: 'That elegant House now occupied by the Honorable
E. W., one of His Majesty's Council for the Province of New
Brunswick, consisting of four beautiful Rooms on the first Floor,
highly finished. Also two spacious lodging chambers in the second
story--a capacious dry cellar with arches &c. &c. &c.' In Upper
Canada, owing to the difficulty of obtaining building materials, the
houses of the half-pay officers were even less pretentious. A
traveler passing through the country about Johnstown in 1792
described Sir John Johnson's house as 'a small country lodge, neat,
but as the grounds are only beginning to be cleared, there was
nothing of interest.'
The home of the average Loyalist was a log-cabin. Sometimes the
cabin contained one room, sometimes two. Its dimensions were as a
rule no more than fourteen feet by eighteen feet, and sometimes ten
by fifteen. The roofs were constructed of bark or small hollowed
basswood logs, overlapping one another like tiles. The windows were
as often as not covered not with glass, but with oiled paper. The
chimneys were built of sticks and clay, or rough unmortared stones,
since bricks were not procurable; sometimes there was no chimney,
and the smoke was allowed to find its way out through a hole in the
bark roof. Where it was impossible to obtain lumber, the doors were
made of pieces of timber split into rough boards; and in some cases
the hinges and latches were made of wood. These old log cabins, with
the chinks between the logs filled in with clay and moss, were still
to be seen standing in many parts of the country as late as fifty
years ago. Though primitive, they seem to have been not
uncomfortable; and many of the old settlers clung to them long after
they could have afforded to build better. This was doubtless partly
due to the fact that log-houses were exempt from the taxation laid
on frame, brick, and stone structures.
A few of the Loyalists succeeded in bringing with them to Canada
some sticks of furniture or some family heirlooms. Here and there a
family would possess an ancient spindle, a pair of curiously-wrought
fire-dogs, or a quaint pair of hand-bellows. But these relics of a
former life merely served to accentuate the rudeness of the greater
part of the furniture of the settlers. Chairs, benches, tables,
beds, chests, were fashioned by hand from the rough wood. The
descendant of one family has described how the family dinner-table
was a large stump, hewn flat on top, standing in the middle of the
floor. The cooking was done at the open fireplace; it was not until
well on in the nineteenth century that stoves came into common use
in Canada.
The clothing of the settlers was of the most varied description.
Here and there was one who had brought with him the tight
knee-breeches and silver-buckled shoes of polite society. But many
had arrived with only what was on their backs; and these soon found
their garments, no matter how carefully darned and patched, succumb
to the effects of time and labor. It was not long before the
settlers learnt from the Indians the art of making clothing out of
deer-skin. Trousers made of this material were found both
comfortable and durable. 'A gentleman who recently died in
Sophiasburg at an advanced age, remembered to have worn a pair for
twelve years, being repaired occasionally, and at the end they were
sold for two dollars and a half.' Petticoats for women were also
made of deer-skin. 'My grandmother,' says one descendant, 'made all
sorts of useful dresses with these skins, which were most
comfortable for a country life, and for going through the bush
[since they] could not be torn by the branches.' There were of
course, some articles of clothing which could not readily be made of
leather; and very early the settlers commenced growing flax and
raising sheep for their wool. Home-made linen and clothing of
linsey-woolsey were used in the settlements by high and low alike.
It was not until the close of the eighteenth century that articles
of apparel, other than those made at home of flax and wool, were
easily obtainable. A calico dress was a great luxury. Few daughters
expected to have one until it was bought for their wedding-dress.
Great efforts were always made to array the bride in fitting
costume; and sometimes a dress, worn by the mother in other days,
amid other scenes, was brought forth, yellow and discolored with the
lapse of time.
There was little money in the settlements. What little there was
came in pay to the soldiers or the half-pay officers. Among the
greater part of the population, business was carried on by barter.
In Upper Canada the lack of specie was partly overcome by the use of
a kind of paper money. 'This money consists of small squares of card
or paper, on which are printed promissory notes for various sums.
These notes are made payable once a year, generally about the latter
end of September at Montreal. The name of the merchant or firm is
subscribed.' This was merely an extension of the system of credit
still in use with country merchants, but it provided the settlers
with a very convenient substitute for cash. The merchants did not
suffer, as frequently this paper money was lost, and never
presented; and cases were known of its use by Indians as wadding for
their flint-locks.
Social instincts among the settlers were strongly marked. Whenever a
family was erecting a house or barn, the neighbors as a rule lent a
helping hand. While the men were raising barn-timbers and
roof-trees, the women gathered about the quilting-frames or the
spinning-wheels. After the work was done, it was usual to have a
festival. The young men wrestled and showed their prowess at trials
of strength; the rest looked on and applauded. In the evening there
was a dance, at which the local musician scraped out tuneless tunes
on an ancient fiddle; and there was of course hearty eating and, it
is to be feared, heavy drinking.
Schools and churches were few and far between. A number of Loyalist
clergy settled both in Nova Scotia and in Upper Canada, and these
held services and taught school in the chief centers of population.
The Rev. John Stuart was, for instance, appointed chaplain in 1784
at Cataraqui; and in 1786 he opened an academy there, for which he
received government aid. In time other schools sprang up, taught by
retired soldiers or farmers who were incapacitated for other work.
The tuition given in these schools was of the most elementary sort.
La Rochefoucauld, writing of Cataraqui in 1795, says: 'In this
district are some schools, but they are few in number. The children
are instructed in reading and writing, and pay each a dollar a
month. One of the masters, superior to the rest in point of
knowledge, taught Latin; but he has left the school, without being
succeeded by another instructor of the same learning.' 'At seven
years of age,' writes the son of a Loyalist family, 'I was one of
those who patronized Mrs Cranahan, who opened a Sylvan Seminary for
the young idea in Adolphustown; from thence, I went to Jonathan
Clark's, and then tried Thomas Morden, lastly William Faulkiner, a
relative of the Hagermans. You may suppose that these graduations to
Parnassus was [sic] carried into effect, because a large amount of
knowledge could be obtained. Not so; for Dilworth's Spelling Book,
and the New Testament, were the only books possessed by these
academies.'
The lack of a clergy was even more marked. When Bishop Mountain
visited Upper Canada in 1794, he found only one Lutheran chapel and
two Presbyterian churches between Montreal and Kingston. At Kingston
he found 'a small but decent church,' and about the Bay of Quinte
there were three or four log huts which were used by the Church of
England missionary in the neighborhood. At Niagara there was a
clergyman, but no church; the services were held in the Freemasons'
Hall. This lack of a regularly-ordained clergy was partly remedied
by a number of itinerant Methodist preachers or 'exhorters.' These
men were described by Bishop Mountain as 'a set of ignorant
enthusiasts, whose preaching is calculated only to perplex the
understanding, to corrupt the morals, to relax the nerves of
industry, and dissolve the bands of society.' But they gained a very
strong hold on the Loyalist population; and for a long time they
were familiar figures upon the country roads.
For many years communications both in New Brunswick and in Upper
Canada were mainly by water. The roads between the settlements were
little more than forest paths. When Colonel Simcoe went to Upper
Canada he planned to build a road running across the province from
Montreal to the river Thames, to be called Dundas Street. He was
recalled, however, before the road was completed; and the project
was allowed to fall through. In 1793 an act was passed by the
legislature of Upper Canada 'to regulate the laying out, amending,
and keeping in repair, the public highways and roads.' This threw on
the individual settler the obligation of keeping the road across his
lot in good repair; but the large amount of crown lands and clergy
reserves and land held by speculators throughout the province made
this act of little avail. It was not until 1798 that a road was run
from the Bay of Quinte to the head of Lake Ontario, by an American
surveyor named Asa Danforth. But even this government road was at
times impassable; and there is evidence that some travelers
preferred to follow the shore of the lake.
It will be seen from these notes on social history that the
Loyalists had no primrose path. But after the first grumblings and
discontents, poured into the ears of Governor Haldimand and Governor
Parr, they seem to have settled down contentedly to their lot; and
their life appears to have been on the whole happy. Especially in
the winter, when they had some leisure, they seem to have known how
to enjoy themselves.
In the winter season, nothing is more ardently wished for, by young
persons of both sexes, in Upper Canada, than the setting in of
frost, accompanied by a fall of snow. Then it is, that pleasure
commences her reign. The sleighs are drawn out. Visits are paid, and
returned, in all directions. Neither cold, distance, or badness of
roads prove any impediment. The sleighs glide over all obstacles. It
would excite surprise in a stranger to view the open before the
Governor's House on a levee morning, filled with these carriages. A
sleigh would not probably make any great figure in Bond street,
whose silken sons and daughters would probably mistake it for a
turnip cart, but in the Canadas, it is the means of pleasure, and
glowing healthful exercise. An overturn is nothing. It contributes
subject matter for conversation at the next house that is visited,
when a pleasant raillery often arises on the derangement of dress,
which the ladies have sustained, and the more than usual display of
graces, which the tumble has occasioned.
This picture, drawn in 1793 by a nameless traveler, is an evidence
of the courage and buoyancy of heart with which the United Empire
Loyalists faced the toils and privations of life in their new home.
Not drooping like poor fugitives they came In exodus to our Canadian
wilds, But full of heart and hope, with heads erect And fearless
eyes victorious in defeat.
This site includes some historical materials that
may imply negative stereotypes reflecting the culture or language of
a particular period or place. These items are presented as part of
the historical record and should not be interpreted to mean that the
WebMasters in any way endorse the stereotypes implied.
Chronicles of Canada, The
United Empire Loyalists, A Chronicle of the Great Migration, 1915
Chronicles of Canada |